nuke cygwin legacy?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:48:12PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500
>> Subject: nuke cygwin legacy?
>
>Greetings, All,
>
>> Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5
>> support so I'm wondering if anyone has any objections to removing
>> 1.5 from cygwin.com.
>> 
>> I was going to suggest this a few months ago and mention that the Cygwin
>> Time Machine was an alternative but it looks like that service is no
>> longer available.
>
>That is incorrect.  The Cygwin Time Machine is still up and actively 
>collecting updates.  I have been having internet connectivity issues as of 
>late, but those (hopefully) should have (mostly) been resolved.
>If you can't get to the Time Machine, wait a few minutes and try again.

Thanks for the update.  I'd tried a few times in the last month and was
never able to get through.  It works now though, as you say.

cgf