[ITA] ruby-atk 4.1.7

[Daisuke Fujimura]

Thank you for your advice.

I wasn't sure if there was any problem mixing noarch and x86_64 in the
same package, but from this description it seems safe.

I plan to deploy with `ARCH=noarch`.

- https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/5431600438

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09 PM Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On 27/06/2023 08:32, Daisuke Fujimura via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > ====
> >
> > Cygportfile:
> > - https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/playground/tree/?h=ruby-atk
> >
> > Packages, logs:
> > - https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/5383991799
>
> > # we have to wait until the old archful ones are archived
> > #ARCH=noarch
>
> I'm not sure what this comment means.
>
> I think all the historical limitations around changing between arch and
> archful have been removed [1], so if this package is now noarch, please
> mark it as such.
>
> Otherwise, looks good. I added this to your packages.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2019-June/039614.html